Discussion about this post

User's avatar
joe.nalven2's avatar

I would be on board with a Marshall Plan concept for uplifting those struggling to enter our society in a meaningful way. BUT. . . Yes, there's a but.

Leaping from the story of Denice in this article does not take us into that Marshall Plan. No one can dispute her tale of woe, nor of Nandini Patwardhan's personal efforts to work with Denice. But, having been a welfare worker in the 1960s in Brooklyn, and realizing the many job programs that have come and gone, I have to pull my hair out in waiting to see how government can be the answer that Nandini Patwardhan expects.

There's another but . . . all of the wishes Nandini lists sound like a nanny state run by Bernie Sanders. From there, she jumps into a Marshall Plan. That seems like a giant disconnect between what I imagine as a Marshall Plan and all of the hopes she has about getting employers to be welfare workers. Business is not welfare. Well, maybe in some other country. Here, the golden goose that drives the economy can only have so many restraints (however well intended) before the goose says, 'enough, no more gold.' This may sound harsh, and to some extent it is, but I can't think of an economy that does what Nandini would like -- not here, not India, nor China, not Venezuela.

So, perhaps, Nandini can do a follow up with the pragmatics of what can be done that either hasn't been done before or can be done with a difference.

I commend Free Black Thought for publishing Nandini's thought bubble. Perhaps it will drive an important discussion that is worth having.

Dave's avatar

Read Amity Shlaes' "The Great Society, A New History" and you'll see that a "Marshall Plan" of sorts started in the '60's and has contributed to much of the present pathology in communities of color. I also commend Thomas Sowell's "Race and Culture" and Glenn Loury's works on race, culture and achievement.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?