Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brandy's avatar

Absolutely yes, if your privilege is measured against what I assume to be average "white privilege" Your health problems are my health problems mentally for the same reasons you list (childhood bad stuff, really bad) and my husband's work ethic made him the best but he's 45 and has had multiple surgeries to help him keep working his heavy-duty job in a place he has built. We started our marriage stepping over a hole in a trailer to get inside. We have tried very hard and have been able to put our sons in a better position than we had, but we can't quit anytime soon. And, yep. We still get phone calls from family members calling collect. I know you know. It takes so very much to overcome a tough hand of dealt cards. According to what I believe is meant by the American Dream, though it's not all it's cracked up to be some days, you've made it! You're actually doing much better than most. If you are like me, the goal is not to pass down the tough beginnings. Congratulations 🎊

CroatianOx's avatar

It's interesting how this concept of "privilege" has morphed over the years. When I was growing up in the 80s and 90s, "privilege," as in coming from a "privileged background," referred to those who were at least upper-middle-class and most often referred to the wealthy.

But then, around 2010 or maybe 2012, the concept of "privilege" expanded to include anyone who was "marginalized," most often referring to race and ethnicity (and not class).

I've been in academia for my entire adult life, so I witnessed this shift firsthand. I was able to roll with the changes in these terms, perhaps because I am a Xennial and didn't have super-fixed ideas about the world at that time. But at faculty development workshops on (white) privilege, many of my boomer colleagues were operating with the old sense of the term "privilege" and were very, very confused as a result. This confusion was never addressed during the workshop; it was mistaken for outright resistance to the concept of privilege. I think this is because the younger faculty members leading these workshops were operating with the new sense of "privilege."

Over the years, it seems "privilege" has become a sociological shorthand (at best) and invective (at worst). But I've noticed that my students over the past year or two are less likely to use this term to describe people. I'm not sure if this is a result of the vibe shift or because students are trying to get out of the linguistic box that Gen X and Millennials put them in. (The irony is, is that they are creating another, more kaleidoscopic linguistic box in the process!)

Even as a sociological shorthand, the term "privileged" is vey limiting, a blunt instrument. Too often the idea of privilege is seen as a "you either have it, or you don't" kind of concept, or a way of sorting people into the "good" camp or the "bad" camp. I mean, people see it as an absolute concept, not a relative one.

Bailey's piece is so rhetorical in nature, and I'm not 100% sure of his intentions. Is he deconstructing the concept of "privilege"? Or, is he doubling down on the racial connotations of "privilege"? For me, once you look at the concept of "privilege" on the granular level and how it applies to any one individual, the whole thing breaks down, becomes incoherent, obfuscating. It hides more than it reveals.

25 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?