2 hrs ago·edited 52 mins agoLiked by Michael David Cobb Bowen
All the top colleges -- Harvard, Yale, etc. -- submitted amicus brief at SFFA vs. Harvard predicting with absolute certainty that without explicit racial favoritism (and its necessary discrimination against meritorious non-black students -- which is the basis of the SFFA lawsuit and which this conversation doesn't mention), black admission rate would drop to minuscule numbers. This is did not happen. Either these schools lied then, or they cheated now.
There was exaggeration in the amicus briefs, no doubt, but the preponderance of evidence is that top colleges are cheating now, using "race essays" (tell us about your oppression) and racial proxies (which Yale essentially admitted using). So stay tuned -- there'll be a lot more litigation to come, now on cheating. And don't forget that racial favoritism for any race under any excuse ("inclusion") necessarily means racial discrimination against another race -- not a good thing for America.
All the top colleges -- Harvard, Yale, etc. -- submitted amicus brief at SFFA vs. Harvard predicting with absolute certainty that without explicit racial favoritism (and its necessary discrimination against meritorious non-black students -- which is the basis of the SFFA lawsuit and which this conversation doesn't mention), black admission rate would drop to minuscule numbers. This is did not happen. Either these schools lied then, or they cheated now.
There was exaggeration in the amicus briefs, no doubt, but the preponderance of evidence is that top colleges are cheating now, using "race essays" (tell us about your oppression) and racial proxies (which Yale essentially admitted using). So stay tuned -- there'll be a lot more litigation to come, now on cheating. And don't forget that racial favoritism for any race under any excuse ("inclusion") necessarily means racial discrimination against another race -- not a good thing for America.